Applying Peter Palchinsky’s Three Industrial Design to Improve Performance of Government Venture Capitals in Malaysia

  • Mohd Suhaimi Mohamed Ariffin Universiti Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA
  • Haslinah Muhammad Universiti Putra Malaysia, MALAYSIA
  • Mazlan Hassan Universiti Putra Malaysia, MALAYSIA
  • Abdul Rahim Abdul Samad Universiti Putra Malaysia, MALAYSIA


Purpose: On the background of substantial decline in foreign direct investment (FDI) flow into Malaysia, the GVCs are suggested to apply the Palchinsky principles to raise performances hence contributing to the socioeconomic growth of Malaysia.

Research Methodology: By conceptually integrating the Peter Palchinsky’s three industrial design with literature on innovation.

Results: First, GVCs to adopt collective criteria chosen by the technopreneurs when evaluating funds applications. Second, to let them choose among themselves who should get the funding in a given cycle instead of decided by the management of GVCs alone. Third, adopt lottery like selection to choose winners eligible for funding. Fourth, shared responsibility among technopreneurs is another possible method where applicants are organized in a group and funding given to a ‘deserving’ group rather than to an individual technology-based company. Lastly, performance bonuses to deserving personnel at GVCs.

Limitations: The absence of data built upon the suggestions made in the study, limits the ability to measure potential impact. Singling out punctuated cases of success does not offer direct evidence that learning from failures could actually improve innovation.  

Contribution: Innovation in venture capital activities and add volume to the of entrepreneurial finance literature.


Afful-Dadzie, E., Oplatková, Z. K., & Nabareseh, S. (2015). Selecting start-up businesses in a public Venture capital financing using Fuzzy PROMETHEE. Procedia Computer Science, 60(1), 63–72.
Asplund, M., Sandin, R. (1999). The survival of new products. Review of Industrial Organization, 15, 219–236.
Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43, 354–363.
Cozijnsen, A., Vrakking, W., & van Ijzerloo, M. (2000). Success and failure of 50 innovation projects in Dutch companies. European Journal of Innovation Management, 3, 150–159.
D’Este, P., Amara, N., & Olmos, J. (2016). Fostering novelty while reducing failure: Balancing the twin challeges of product innovation. Technological Forecasting Social Change, 113, 280–292.
Danneels, E., & Vestal, A. (2020). Normalizing vs. analyzing: Drawing the lessons from failure to enhance firm innovativeness. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(1), 105903.
Davies, R. W. (1994). The Economic Transformation of the Soviet Union, 1913-1945. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Desai, V. (2010a). Do organizations have ton change to learn? Examining the effects of technological change and learning from failures in the natural gas distribution industry. Industrial Corporate Change, 19(3), 713–739.
Desai, V. (2010b). Learning to learn from failures: The impact of operating experience on railroad accident responses. Industrial Corporate Change, 25(2), 1–28.
Ferreira, J. J. M., Fernandes, C. I., & Ferreira, F. A. F. (2019). To be or not to be digital, that is the question: Firm innovation and performance. Journal of Business Research, 101(November 2018), 583–590.
Geroski, P., Machin, S., & van Reenen, J. (1993). The Profitability of Innovating Firms. Rand Journal of Economics, 14, 198–211.
Gilson, L. L., & Goldberg, C. B. (2015). Editors’ Comment: So, What Is a Conceptual Paper? Group and Organization Management, 40(2), 127–130.
Graham, L. (1996). (1996). , 140(2), 175-185. Palchinsky’s Travels: A Russian Engineer’s Adventures among Gigantic Projects and Small Minds., 140(2), 175–185.
Graham, L. R. (1993). The Ghost of the Executed Engineer: Technology and the Fall of the Soviet Union. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP.
Guo, J., Chen, M., Sun, X., Wang, Z., & Xue, J. (2021). Leveraging industrial-technological innovation to achieve sustainable development: A systems thinking perspective. PLoS ONE, 15(12 December).
Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: four approaches. AMS Review, 10, 18–26.
Kleinknecht, A., Oostenddorp, R., Pradhan, M. (1997). Patterns and economic effects of flexibility in labour relations in the Netherlands: An exploration of the OSA demand and supply panels. The Netherlands: SDU Publisher.
Koch, A., & Strotmann, H. (2008). The impact of functional integration and spatial proximity on the post-entry performances of knowledge intensive business service firms. Internal Small Business Journal, 24(6), 610–634.
Kristina B. Dahlin, Y.-T. C. and T. J. R. (2017). Opportunity, Motivation, and Ability to Learn from Failures and Errors: Review, Synthesis, and Ways to Move Forward. Academy of Management, 12(1), 257–277.
Leoncini, R. (2016). Learning by Failing. An empirical exercise on CIS data. Research Policy, 45(2), 376–386.
Luukkonen, T., Deschryvere, M., & Bertoni, F. (2013). The value added by government venture capital funds compared with independent venture capital funds. Technovation, 33(4–5), 154–162.
Matthew Syed. (2020). Black Box Thinking.
Ridley, M. (2020). How Innovation Works.
Teker, D., Teker, S., & Teraman, Ö. (2016). Venture Capital Markets: A Cross Country Analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance, 38(October 2015), 213–218.
Tim Harford. (2011). Adapt.
Tim Harford. (2012). Adapt. St Martin’s Press.
United Nations UNCTAD. (2021). World Investment Report | UNCTAD. In United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Retrieved from
Zhang, Y., & Mayes, D. G. (2018). The performance of governmental venture capital firms: A life cycle perspective and evidence from China. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 48(January 2017), 162–185.
How to Cite
Mohamed Ariffin, M. S., Muhammad, H., Hassan, M., & Abdul Samad, A. R. (2022). Applying Peter Palchinsky’s Three Industrial Design to Improve Performance of Government Venture Capitals in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship and Social Science, 3(01), 25-39.